EN中文
索取报价
01研究方向

Creatine Monohydrate 研究方向

01研究方向

这个分子为什么有研究文献

一水肌酸是研究最充分的运动营养原料，几乎全部肌酸临床文献——肌肉生理、抗阻训练试验、老年人群、认知与安全性监测——都是用这一形态做的。此外还有一支规模小得多的药剂学技术文献，研究的是原料本身：溶解度、颗粒工程与降解行为。这两支对采购方都有意义，而颗粒级（granular）规格正落在第二支里。

02文献综述

文献研究了哪些方向

肌肉肌酸负荷与该领域最终采用的给药方案

整个领域沿用的给药惯例可以追溯到两项早期研究。Harris、Söderlund 与 Hultman（1992）测定了正常受试者补充前后静息肌与运动肌中的肌酸含量，报告了肌肉肌酸的升高，确立了基本的摄取观察。随后 Hultman 等（1996）在男性受试者中比较了不同负荷策略，考察「高剂量短期负荷」与「较低日剂量长期维持」，并分别报告了肌肉肌酸结果。正是这两篇论文，使此后的文献几乎一致采用两种方案之一：约 20 g/日的短期负荷后接低剂量维持，或不做负荷、直接采用低日剂量。Antonio 等（2021）综述了此后围绕这些方案反复出现的问题与误解。

抗阻训练结局与安全性标志物监测

这是文献最密集的部分，以「抗阻训练作为共同干预」的随机安慰剂对照试验为主，再做合并分析。国际运动营养学会立场声明（Kreider 等，2017）综述了安全性与有效性证据，报告各项研究一致显示补充可提高肌内肌酸浓度。Burke 等（2023）针对「肌酸+抗阻训练」的试验，对局部肌肥大指标做了系统综述与荟萃分析。安全性方面，Tsiaras 等（2026）对 20 项随机研究就肾功能终点做荟萃分析，报告血清肌酐上升约 0.13 mg/dL，而尿素与估算 GFR 无显著差异，并指出仍缺少超过一年的长期试验。这类血清肌酐位移，对任何解读受试者血检结果的人来说，都是已知的分析学干扰问题。

认知与非运动人群

研究早已超出「年轻抗阻训练男性」的范围，但这部分证据更薄、异质性更大。Prokopidis 等（2023）对 8 项随机对照试验做荟萃分析，考察健康人群的记忆指标，报告合并标准化均数差为 0.29，异质性较大（I² = 66%）；66–76 岁老年亚组的效应量大于年轻受试者，后者未检出显著效应；纳入试验的剂量跨度约为 2.2–20 g/日。Naddafha 等（2026）对绝经后女性的随机安慰剂对照试验做系统综述与荟萃分析，结局包括瘦体重、1RM 力量、骨密度、体能与安全性指标。两项综合分析都指出试验数量少、剂量与周期跨度大，是解读上的限制。

原料本身：溶解度、颗粒工程与降解

这是与颗粒级规格最直接相关的一支文献，数量不多但内容具体。2026 年一篇关于速溶型一水肌酸的综述报告：一水肌酸 25 °C 水中热力学溶解度不超过 13 g/L，并梳理了微粉化与制粒两条主要加工路径；文中引用的研究显示平均粒径从 44.67 µm 降至 0.36–9.06 µm 区间，晶习由针状变为球状，制粒则可得到流动性好、无粉尘的颗粒。另一方面，Saiki 等（2025）用 ATR-FTIR 与高分辨质谱表征了肌酸在热应力、紫外、pH 变化与饮料基质下的降解。两者共同界定了颗粒级所代表的权衡：流动性与粉尘表现，对溶出速率。

03规格

这些文献对你定规格意味着什么

规格制定有两点。其一，结局类文献都是用一水肌酸做的，因此一水肌酸规格才是真正能对应已发表方案的那一个——通常是短期高剂量负荷，或持续的低日剂量，两者均以一水肌酸计。其二，颗粒级的理由在工艺侧而非临床侧：它解决的是流动性、扬尘与胶囊/压片操作性，代价是相对微粉化物料的溶出速率。溶解度与稳定性数据应针对成品基质另行索取，不能从粉体直接推定。

04参考文献

引用文献

仅为研究背景。以下每一条描述的是某项已发表研究考察了什么、报告了什么，不构成对本原料的宣称，也不构成对任何成品的宣称。法规与标签口径应由把产品投放市场的品牌方自行判断。

  1. An early controlled study measured creatine content in resting and exercised muscle of normal subjects and reported elevation of muscle creatine following supplementation, establishing the basic uptake observation for the field. Harris RC, Söderlund K, Hultman E. Clin Sci (Lond). 1992;83(3):367-374. PMID 1327657DOI 10.1042/cs0830367
  2. A clinical trial compared muscle creatine loading strategies in men, examining a short high-dose loading period against a lower sustained daily dose, and reported the resulting muscle creatine outcomes for each protocol. Hultman E, Söderlund K, Timmons JA, Cederblad G, Greenhaff PL. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;81(1):232-237. PMID 8828669DOI 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.232
  3. A position stand of the International Society of Sports Nutrition reported that studies have consistently shown creatine supplementation increases intramuscular creatine concentrations, and reviewed the safety and efficacy literature in exercise, sport and medicine. Kreider RB, Kalman DS, Antonio J, et al. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:18. PMID 28615996DOI 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
  4. A review examined recurring questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation and set out what the assembled trial evidence did and did not support. Antonio J, Candow DG, Forbes SC, et al. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2021;18(1):13. PMID 33557850DOI 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w
  5. A systematic review with meta-analysis examined trials combining creatine supplementation with resistance training against regional measures of muscle hypertrophy. Burke R, Piñero A, Coleman M, et al. Nutrients. 2023;15(9):2116. PMID 37432300DOI 10.3390/nu15092116
  6. A meta-analysis of eight randomised controlled trials in healthy individuals reported a pooled standardised mean difference of 0.29 for measures of memory with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 66%), with a significant subgroup effect in older adults aged 66-76 and no significant effect detected in participants aged 11-31; doses across included trials ranged from approximately 2.2 to 20 g/day. Prokopidis K, Giannos P, Triantafyllidis KK, Kechagias KS, Forbes SC, Candow DG. Nutr Rev. 2023;81(4):416-427. PMID 35984306DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nuac064
  7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials in postmenopausal women examined creatine monohydrate supplementation, with or without resistance training, against lean mass, one-repetition-maximum strength, bone mineral density, physical function and safety outcomes. Naddafha S, Antonio J, Kreider RB, Stout JR. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2026;23(1):2668435. PMID 42141930DOI 10.1080/15502783.2026.2668435
  8. A systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty randomised studies assessing kidney-function endpoints reported an increase in serum creatinine of approximately 0.13 mg/dL with creatine supplementation, with no significant difference in urea concentrations or estimated glomerular filtration rate, and noted that trials extending beyond one year are still needed. Tsiaras A, Loufopoulos G, Theodoridis X, Liakopoulos V, Poulia KA, Chourdakis M. J Ren Nutr. 2026 Apr 24 [online ahead of print]. PMID 42035842DOI 10.1053/j.jrn.2026.04.010
  9. A review reported that the thermodynamic solubility of creatine monohydrate in water at 25 °C does not exceed 13 g/L, and surveyed micronisation and granulation approaches, including work in which mean particle size fell from 44.67 µm to 0.36-9.06 µm with crystal habit changing from needle-like to spherical, and granulation producing free-flowing dust-free granules. Albagachiev SA, Pinegina ED, Sadkovskii IA, Krasnyuk II, Mandrik MA. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2026;19(1):128. PMID 41599726DOI 10.3390/ph19010128
  10. A multi-analytical study characterised creatine degradation under thermal stress (60-200 °C), UV light, pH variation (pH 3, 8 and 13) and common beverage matrices, using ATR-FTIR and high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify structural modifications relevant to storage, transport and preparation. Saiki PY, Sales GM, de Oliveira AN, Catharino RR. Food Res Int. 2025;221(Pt 3):117472. PMID 41214971DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117472
05相关

相关页面

Creatine Monohydrate — 规格、价格区间与交期全部研究方向

需要这个等级用于你的产线？

RFQ

仅为研究背景。以下每一条描述的是某项已发表研究考察了什么、报告了什么，不构成对本原料的宣称，也不构成对任何成品的宣称。法规与标签口径应由把产品投放市场的品牌方自行判断。